Your   advisor likely has a different perspective than you and may make   recommendations that are "good for you" though you may not perceive   this to be the case.  For example, you   advisor may suggest taking a hard course that has a chance to lower your GPA,   because your advisor believes you will experience more personal growth from   that than from taking an easier course.    This is not moral hazard.  That   the advisor doesn't sugar coat the recommendations is part of the job and in   this sense the advisor is playing an educational role.  However, the advisor may project his or her   own personal likes or dislikes in making a recommendation and to the extent   that your talents and aptitudes don't mirror that of your advisor suggestions   of this sort do exhibit moral hazard.    The extent to which the advisor tells you what you want to hear rather   than work through with you what makes the most sense for you in the long term   may very well depend on how well the two of you know each other.  Certainly, it is easier for the advisor to   say what you want to hear and have you walk away quickly.
   Let us turn to another   intermediary, the appraiser.  If the   buyer is seeking to get a mortgage to purchase the new home, the lending   institution will insist on having the property appraised because the property   will serve as collateral for the loan.    The appraisal is presumably an independent valuation of the   property.  Of particular interest to   us, the appraiser's job is something like identifying the marginal buyers and   sellers.  (See the Scale worksheet from   the S&D Updated module.)  But of   course this is much harder to do in actuality than in the textbook case   because one has to find "comparables" that differ in some respects   from the property under consideration and because the known transaction   prices will have occurred in the past and market conditions do change over   time.  It is hard for the appraiser to   measure short term temporal changes in market conditions.  Moreover, the appraiser doesn't get   evidence from nearby homes that may be quite similar to the property under   consideration, if those homes have not been bought and sold recently.
   It is important to note   that he appraiser's client is the bank or other lending institution, not the   buyer or seller or the home.  The   bank's profit is in part determined by the size of the loan and so in some   sense the bank has incentive to have the house appraised high, because if the   house appraises low the transaction price will be negotiated down and that   will reduce the loan size.  However,   most mortgage loans are re-sold on a secondary market rather than held by the   initial lender and that resale serves to discipline the appraisal and not   have it overvalue the property.  But   one should realize there is potential for moral hazard in the appraisal   process.  
It is   recognized that appraiser valuations vary less than actual transaction   prices.  Moral hazard may be one   explanation for this but it might also have to do with the appraiser's need   to rely on historical transactions and the tendency to average those.
   Another ARUEA Paper
   Since we've covered a lot   of ground here let's conclude this section by having you summarize the   salient points of housing markets and how they differ from retail   markets. 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment